Wir versuchen alle
Texte in allen Sprachen zu veröffentlichen. Wegen begrenzter
Ressourcen ist dies nicht immer möglich. Sollten Sie Interesse
haben Texte für uns zu übersetzen, bitte schicken Sie uns
eine Email.
|
Summary:
Slobodan Adžic, Internet korisnik i aktivista opozicione Demokratske
stranke, izgubio je pravo na svoju WEB prezentaciju jer je na nju
postavio sadržaje koje direktor njegovog ISP, državni "ptt.yu",
ne dozvoljava. Nepostojanje podesnih pravnih pravila i prakse, pa
cak ni ugovora o korišcenju usluga "ptt.yu", zasad omogucava ovakav
arbitreran nacin primene sankcija prema Internet korisnicima od
strane provajdera. Od svih provajdera u Jugoslaviji, jedino EUnet
Jugoslavija ima razraden ugovor o korišcenju usluga. Ono što posebno
zabrinjava je monopolski položaj koji "ptt.yu" ima u unutrašnjosti
Srbije, gde drugi provajderi ili nemaju svoja Internet cvorišta
ili ne mogu da izdrže konkurenciju državnog provajdera.
Prvi
komercijalni davaoci Internet usluga (ISP, Internet Service Provider)
pojavili su se u Srbiji 1996. godine (pre toga funkcionisala je
samo akademska mreža). Od tada do danas broj korisnika Interneta
i ISP rastao je konstantno, ali ubedljivo najbrži rast zabeležen
je tokom NATO napada na Jugoslaviju kada se Internet pretvorio u
osobito "bojno polje", ali i u izvor necenzurisanih informacija
za stanovništvo u Srbiji. Ovaj "boom" u korišcenju Interneta i odgovarajuci
publicitet koji mu je pridat na televiziji i drugim "klasicnim"
medijima ocigledno je, po prvi put od 1996, privukao i pažnju režima
na sadržaj WEB prezentacija, posebno onih postavljenih na servere
ISP u Jugoslaviji.
Iako
je država mogla da, koristeci se zastarelim Zakonom o sistemima
veza SFRJ iz 1988. godine, zadrži monopol na ISP u Jugoslaviji (tako
je, npr. u Hrvatskoj i NR Kini), pošto je prema tom zakonu PTT preduzece
monopolista za pružanje "usluga iz oblasti telekomunikacija u Jugoslaviji",
to se nije dogodilo pa se pojavio veliki broj nezavisnih ISP. Svest
o znacaju i posebno potencijalima Interneta u buducnosti doveo je
do toga da se režim u Beogradu u novije vreme postara da taj medijum
kako-tako stavi pod svoju kontrolu, pa je stoga ucinjen pokušaj
da se za bavljenje pružanjem Internet usluga zahteva izdavanje posebne
dozvole, te da se PTT preduzece ukljuci u ISP biznis sa povoljnijim
cenama (jer svi ostali provajderi moraju placati naknadu PTT-u za
iznajmljene linije, a PTT naravno ne placa sam sebi).
Pravna
regulisanost Interneta predstavlja poseban problem i u državama
u kojoj je vladavina prava u mnogo vecoj meri ostvarena nego u Jugoslaviji,
ali specificnost Jugoslavije i Srbije je da, zapravo, ne samo da
ne postoje nikakvi propisi koji bi se odnosili i na oblast Interneta,
vec ne postoji ni ustaljena praksa i uobicajene analogije koje bi
se primenjivale na rešavanje sporova povodom aktivnosti na Internetu.
Jedino najstariji komercijalni ISP, EUnet Jugoslavija, posluje sa
definisanim Opštim Uslovima poslovanja, dostupnim svim njegovim
korisnicima i izradenim tako da, poštujuci odredbe Zakona o obligacionim
odnosima o opštim uslovima, regulišu najveci broj potencijalno spornih
ponašanja na Internetu. Time je, iako Opšte Uslove nije doneo neki
organ koji ima javna ovlašcenja, bar za korisnike EUnet-a uspostavljena
izvesna pravna sigurnost u pogledu toga šta ISP sme da ucini a šta
ne.
Pocetkom
septembra 1999, Slobodan Adžic, korisnik državnog ISP-a "ptt.yu",
dobio je od administratora upozorenje da na svojoj licnoj WEB prezentaciji
ima "nedozvoljene sadržaje", bez bližih razjašnjenja povodom navodne
"nedozvoljenosti", te da ce mu prezentacija biti ukinuta ako te
sadržaje ne otkloni. Smatrajuci da je bio sporan naziv prezentacije,
koji je asocirao na naziv neke kompanije (MANAGEMENT-MARKETING-INTERNET),
g. Adžic ga je promenio naslovljavajuci prezentaciju sopstvenim
licnim imenom. Potom mu je administrator "ptt.yu", u ponovnom upozorenju,
objasnio da je zabranjeni sadržaj još tu, upucujuci na to da je
ono što je zabranjeno "slike". U svom odgovoru na upozorenje, g.
Adžic se zacudio jer na njegovoj prezentaciji, izuzev male slike
britanske zastave, koja upucuje na verziju prezentacije na engleskom
jeziku, drugih slika nema, i pokušao da objasni da je stavljanje
slicica sa zastavama uobicajeni nacin upucivanja na drugi jezik
kada su u pitanju višejezicne prezentacije. Naposletku, 16. septembra
1999, vidno iznervirani administrator poslao je g. Adžicu poslednje
upozorenje, objašnjavajuci mu da je sporna cinjenica da je na njegovoj
prezentaciji slika Slobodana Miloševica "u delu ostavka", te da
PTT Srbija, pošto je državno preduzece (?!) ne omogucava prezentacije
sa politickim sadržajem (kao da država nije par exellance politicka
tvorevina, i kao da je Slobodan Miloševic sam država). Uz to, administrator
je dodao da je nalog da se upozori g. Adžic došao od strane direktora
PTT Srbija Net, tako i nevoljno priznajuci potpunu arbitrernost
u odlucivanju o skidanju prezentacije g. Adžica sa servera "ptt.yu".
G.
Adžic je, revoltiran ovakvim ponašanjem, pristao da se prezentacija
skine, napominjuci da je posredi namerno kršenje ustavnih odredaba
o slobodi govora i savesti, i kršenje njegovog prava da kao gradanin
Srbije ima svoj legitiman politicki stav. Uz to, objasnio je da
je on kao aktivista opozicione Demokratske stranke, koja sprovodi
inicijative za smenu Slobodana Miloševica, na svoju prezentaciju
samo stavio link ka prezentaciji Demokratske stranke, te da njegova
prezentacija na serverima "ptt.yu" zapravo ne sadrži sliku Slobodana
Miloševica. Ovim je zapravo pokazano da administratori sistema "ptt.yu"
ne znaju dovoljno o strukturi Interneta, a da u obavljanju svojih
"cenzorskih" zadataka proveravaju ne samo sadržinu prezentacija
na svojim serverima vec i linkove koji sa tih prezentacija upucuju
drugde.
"Cenzorska"
poslovna politika preduzeca PTT Srbija Net, na žalost, ne može se
pravno napadati u državi u kojoj se pravo uopšte ne poštuje, jer
to bi znacilo snositi velike troškove spora bez ikakvog izgleda
da politicki kontrolisani sudovi presude protiv države. Na srecu,
"ptt.yu" nije jedini ISP u Jugoslaviji. Ipak zabrinjava cinjenica
da ovo preduzece u mnogim manjim gradovima u Srbiji ima monopolski
položaj u pružanju Internet usluga, tako da cenzura koju primenjuje
prema svojim "opozicionim" korisnicima verovatno ima odredene efekte.
Uslov da Internet u Srbiji, kao i u svetu, postane istinski slobodan
medij za razmenu mišljenja i informacija svih vrsta, je opstanak
i razvoj nedržavnih ISP, koji su dosad nekako uspeli da odole neutaživoj
želji režima da sve kontroliše i sve neprijatno po njega cenzuriše.
Miloša
Zivkovica, asistenta na Pravnom fakultetu u Beogradu
Trudicemo se da sve
tekstove predstavimo na svim jezicima. Obzirom da su nam izvori, budzet
i broj ljudi veoma ograniceni znamo da necemo biti u mogucnosti da
ovaj cilj u potpunosti postignemo. Ukoliko zelite da nam pomognete
oko prevoda molimo vas da nas kontaktirate
na.
|
Summary:
Slobodan Adžic, Internet user and the opposition Democratic Party
activist lost his right on a Web presentation, for placing there
a content not allowed by the manager of his ISP, state owned "ptt.yu".
The lack of the adequate legal regulation and case law, and even
the lack of the contract that would regulate the "ptt.yu" services,
enables Internet Service Provider to impose arbitrary sanctions
towards Internet users. Among all the Internet Service Providers
in Yugoslavia, Eunet Yugoslavia is the only one to have the detailed
contract of services. What worries is the monopolistic position
of the "ptt.yu" in inner Serbia where other Internet Service Providers
have no links, or can not stand the competition of the state owned
Provider.
The
first commercial Internet Service Providers (ISP) appeared in Serbia
in the year of 1996 (only the academic network was functioning earlier).
Since then the number of the Internet users, as well as the number
of the Internet Service Providers was on the constant rise and even
smashing during the NATO bombing of Yugoslavia which turned Internet
into a specific "battle field", but also the source of uncensored
information to the Serbian population. Boom of the Internet usage
and the publicity gained on the television and other classic media,
attracted, for the first time since the 1996, the attention of the
regime to the contents of the Web presentations, especially those
on the servers of the Internet Service Providers in Yugoslavia.
Even
though the outdated Telecommunications Law Act of 1988 provided
the possibility for the regime to retain the monopoly on the ISP
in Yugoslavia (as for instance in Croatia or China), since according
to that Law Act PTT Company (state owned postal and telecommunication
company) is a monopolist in rendering "telecommunication services
in Yugoslavia", that never actually happened, and the number of
independent Internet Service Providers appeared. Being aware of
the significance and especially prospects of the Internet in the
future, regime in Belgrade is trying lately to somehow take the
control over the media, by the attempt to request the special permission
for the Internet Service Providing and by involving of the PTT Company
into the ISP business with lower prices (since PTT Company owns
the phone lines and do not have to pay for their renting as other
providers do).
Legal
regulation of Internet is a specific problem even in countries where
the rule of the law is achieved to the greater extent than in Yugoslavia,
but what is characteristic of Serbia and Yugoslavia is not only
that there are not any regulations regarding the field of Internet,
but also that there are no case law nor applicable analogies that
would help solving the disputes arising from Internet related activities.
Only the first commercial ISP, EUnet Jugoslavia is operating according
to the General Conditions, accessible to all the users and created
in accordance with the Obligations Law Act and in such manner to
regulate all of the potentially disputable issues. In such a way,
even though General Conditions were not passed on by some governmental
agency, for the EUnet users, at least, it is certain what can and
what can not be done by the ISP.
At
the beginning of September 1999, Slobodan Adžic, user of the state-owned
ISP "ptt.yu", was warned by his administrator on "prohibited contents"
on his personal Web presentation, without any explanation what exactly
is "prohibited", and he was therefore warned that his presentation
will be removed from the server if he fails to remove "prohibited
contents". Considering that the title of his presentation (MANAGEMENT
- MARKETING - INTERNET) might be disputable, for liability to create
a confusion with the name of some company, Mr. Adžic changed the
title of his presentation, leaving only his name as the title. Afterwards
administrator of the "ptt.yu" sent another warning, stating that
"prohibited contents" is still not removed from the presentation,
this time explaining that what actually was prohibited were "pictures".
In his answer to the warning, Mr. Adžic expressed his astonishment,
since there were no pictures on his presentation, except the small
British flag, as the link to his presentation in English language.
He tried to explain that the pictures of the flags are the usual
way of pointing to the other languages in the multilingual presentations.
Finally, on September 16th, noticeably annoyed administrator sent
his last warning, explaining that the problematic picture is the
picture of President Slobodan Miloševic "in the part resignation".
He stated that the PTT Serbia, being state-owned company (!?), is
not allowing political contents in Web presentations (as if the
state itself is not a political phenomenon par exellance, and as
if Slobodan Miloševic himself is a state). The administrator also
stated that he was ordered to warn Mr. Adžic by the Manager of the
PTT Serbia Net, and in such a way unwillingly admitted that the
deciding upon the removal of Mr. Adžic's Web presentation from the
"ptt.yu" server was completely arbitrary.
Mr.
Adžic, indignant with such a behaviour, agreed to removal of his
Web presentation, but stated that it was actually the violation
of the constitutional regulation on the freedom of speech and freedom
of conscience, as well as the violation of his right, as the citizen
of Serbia, to express a legitimate political position. Mr. Adžic
also explained that as the activist of the opposition Democratic
Party, which is carrying out the initiative for the resignation
of Slobodan Miloševic, he just placed the link in his Web presentation
to the Web presentation of the Democratic Party, while his Web presentation
on the "ptt.yu" server does not really contain any picture of Slobodan
Miloševic. This proves that the system administrators of the "ptt.yu"
have not adequate knowledge on the Internet structure, and that
they are, while carrying out their "censor's" assignment, checking
out not only the contents of the presentations on their servers,
but also the contents of the linked presentations.
Unfortunately
there is no legal remedy to the "censor's" business policy of the
PTT Serbia Net Company in the country where the law is not respected,
since that would invoke significant expenses, without any chance
that the politically controlled courts would pass on the judgement
against the state. Fortunately, "ptt.yu" is not the only ISP in
Yugoslavia. What worries is the monopolistic position of the "ptt.yu"
in inner Serbia, and therefore the censorship towards the "opposition"
users is probably effective. Condition for Internet in Serbia to
become truly free media of the exchange of the information of any
kind, as elsewhere in the world, is the survival and development
of the independent ISP, which managed so far to resist the insatiable
desire of the regime to control everything and to censor whatever
might be unpleasant.
Miloš
Zivkovic, Assistant Professor of the Belgrade Law School
We are trying to present
all texts in all languages. However, due to a limited resources we
are not always able to achieve this goal. If you would like to translate
material for us, please contact
us.
|